Guest pinkle2525 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 scarlett's position is a little funny...it would have been better without the belly button ring.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gitakawaii Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 rachel mcadams was supposed to be the third girl on that VF cover, but when she arrived on set and found out it was a nude shoot, she left and they did it without her. it was supposed to be three girls only, but i guess they thought two girls only would have been a bit weird and that they needed tom ford for balance. haha I would have done the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vc1188 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I think Scarlett's face ruined the picture. Her expression is so weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nivlacil Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 exposing... imagine all the guys on the set while these photos were being taken... haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest coquette Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I heard it was supposed to be Rachel McAdams instead of Tom Ford (the art director for the issue), but Rachel backed out. I can see why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teeny Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 ehh, i think the photo could have been done better? it just looks very awkward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest seductive secret Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Scarlett's body looks... weird. And Keira looks like a man for some reason.. /).(\ And that guy looks like a total perv, too.. iunno why. I think they coulda done better. Totally! The guy's like smelling kiera. Gross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest graceyoon Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 yeah they do look weird.. their facial expressions are trying too hard to be 'sexy' but tom ford looks hot <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bubbles20 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 rachel mcadams was supposed to be the third girl on that VF cover, but when she arrived on set and found out it was a nude shoot, she left and they did it without her. it was supposed to be three girls only, but i guess they thought two girls only would have been a bit weird and that they needed tom ford for balance. respect for rachel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sj22 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 ew they dont even look nice.. esp Keira Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bistroLAND Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 dang Keira's head doesn't look connected to her body, like it just popped out. Haha the two figured being nude in Vanity Fair is better than Playboy. Still, Rachel made the right choice by backing out, all this picture does for me is make me go "ehh no thanks" n keira's expression is craving-for-something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PINKXDREAMER Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 lol scarlett DOES look like one of those roman sculptures (in a not-so-good way). what melkimx said is intersting. if what she said it's true, then, wow, i love rachel mcadams even more than i already did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowastyle Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 its rather unflattering and soo yuck... not even tastefully done... it woulda been better wit clothes on... to have kiera, scarlett and rachel wit the clothes on?? they're soo hot!! i bet they would have sold more copies... shoot... if kiera, scarlett and rachel were on the mag wit clothes, i'd buy it in a heartbeat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jho Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 i think they look sooo bad like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vannushka Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 omg i keep on thinking Keira is ELIZABETH from pride and prejudice...that's such a horrible thought i have no comment and if it was done..at least make it look better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ANJEE<3 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 the cover could've been done better than that =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Childlike Faith Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I have so much more respect for Rachel McAdams now. :] I think it's so out of the blue. That Scarlett and Kiera would just do a nude shoot all of a sudden. Heeh, Kiera looks abnormally thin and Scarlett looks really pale against the dark background. Viggo Mortensen and Eric Bana? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest getxinfatuated Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Honestly, that kind of scared the crap outta me for a moment. I dislike both of them anyhow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest *lyrynne* Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 venus~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fallen_meteor Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 too much photoshop on them.. too white... ruined the whole thing blaaaaah... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.