Guest Tepper Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 i'd just get a lens brush/pen and clean once in a while. if dust gets on lens, it gets on the filter too. i'd get a filter if i need a certain effect. UV filters are effective at stopping direct damage to the lens glass. Somewhat. heh, well for like a $15 I suppose a filter boosts durability quite a bit. Though dust isn't really stopped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Angie Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 I have an XT, but I'm still crap at using it :[ I need to take time to learn more about it when I'm less busy. I've also been meaning to get a new lens (because right now I only have the kit lens), but I'm low on funds. I need to get a job D: Well, any suggestions on not-pricey, mediocre glass? The neighbor~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brusky Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 you'll have to give us a little more insight so we can help you better what kind of price range do you have? what are your needs (i.e. what things do you shoot)? do you need a lot of zoom power, ability to shoot in low light, etc.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Angie Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 With my current wallet amount I could probably only get something maybe $70-$150 worth. I was looking into the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II. Heard it's pretty good although it's a plastic lens. I'm not that picky anyways, but any opinions on that lens? I don't have any specific needs, I just need a decent all-around lens I suppose. Sorry if I'm being so broad, I still don't know much about photography, but I want to learn >0<;; The stuff I've been shooting lately is mostly in broad daylight, and my subjects are mostly my little brother and his friends playing outside in action, so maybe that will help. Sorry if this was confusing D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest watcher Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 With my current wallet amount I could probably only get something maybe $70-$150 worth. I was looking into the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II. Heard it's pretty good although it's a plastic lens. I'm not that picky anyways, but any opinions on that lens? I don't have any specific needs, I just need a decent all-around lens I suppose. Sorry if I'm being so broad, I still don't know much about photography, but I want to learn >0<;; The stuff I've been shooting lately is mostly in broad daylight, and my subjects are mostly my little brother and his friends playing outside in action, so maybe that will help. Sorry if this was confusing D: well, with the 50, you're gonna be doing a lot of foot-zooming. hehe... but the 50mm is a great lens to learn depth of field, and considering the crop factor, a very good fit for a portrait lens. i think it's worth your money to get one. however, just be sure to give it a fair chance and not get disappointed in it after the first few tries. using primes needs some getting used to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest felinewong Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 WOW - 200-500mm 2.8 lens http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brusky Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 amazing lol wow, imagine carrying that canon around...people might think you were trying to nuke something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joonage Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 WOW - 200-500mm 2.8 lens http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp O dang ... it does look like a nuke ... Try taking a picture without a tripod. xD Are there even filters for something that big???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest malevolent. Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 OH SWEET MOTHER OF PEARL. I used almost half the money I saved up today. Now I need to wait extra longer for my Nikon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest watcher Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 WOW - 200-500mm 2.8 lens http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp goodness! canon doesnt even have a prime @ 2.8 at 500mm, and sigma comes out and does that with a tele-zoom! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chaosiii Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 well, with the 50, you're gonna be doing a lot of foot-zooming. hehe... but the 50mm is a great lens to learn depth of field, and considering the crop factor, a very good fit for a portrait lens. i think it's worth your money to get one. however, just be sure to give it a fair chance and not get disappointed in it after the first few tries. using primes needs some getting used to. I totally agree with u =) I think 50mm lens are awesome I need to get one...if i START taking more pictures xD...buy one ANGIE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest felinewong Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 O dang ... it does look like a nuke ... Try taking a picture without a tripod. xD Are there even filters for something that big???? yea, the filter goes in a holder in the back by the lens mount Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest erure Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 WOW - 200-500mm 2.8 lens http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp I can just see the lens breaking off of my tiny 400D and smashing face down onto the ground... X_X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EYJAYJAY Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 holy mother of jesus, that's a huge freakin lens. man if i had that i'd hire brusky to be the lens stand when i snap pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest erure Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 When you store lenses that aren't being used by your camera is it better to have the glass up or down? Or maybe it doesn't really matter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest watcher Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 When you store lenses that aren't being used by your camera is it better to have the glass up or down? Or maybe it doesn't really matter... i usually keep the wider end down on the floor. unless it's stored in some kind of bag, then it's whatever position it's in in the bag. hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest erure Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 i usually keep the wider end down on the floor. unless it's stored in some kind of bag, then it's whatever position it's in in the bag. hehe Yeah me too but I noticed that all the camera stores display it the other way... So I got kind of O_O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wangta Posted March 10, 2007 Share Posted March 10, 2007 WOW - 200-500mm 2.8 lens http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp hahaha i love the handle on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiwi Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 is there anything out there similar to the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 but with ZOOM? man, foot zooming is frustrating the heck outta me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brusky Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 if you've got some change to spare, $1100'll get you a canon 24-70L. i've shot with this lens before and it's amazingly sharp. has a fair zoom range with a fixed 2.8 ap, but it's a bit heavy to be carrying around all day. it felt like a monster strapped to my xt, especially since i don't have a battery grip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.