Guest chungmah. Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 She looks younger with all that makeup on o_o and in the photo with her dad - she looks photoshopped in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lindoodoo Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Wow. Rofl. So much hate. .__.; Her acting/looking older than she really is isn't agreeable, noting that she has many young fans, but this is actually meant to be an artistic shot. Really, it's actually beautiful. And in the photo, you can really see a 15-year-old innocence in her eyes. Some people in here just pay attention to the fact that she has no shirt on. Plus, SHE'S NOT NAKED, GUYS. CALM YOURSELVES. -.-; She's covered up. Only her back and arms are exposed, like how it would look if she were to wear a bathing suit. But don't get me wrong, I'm not defending her every move, it's just that this isn't something people should be overreacting about. And bashing her like this is just not right. >_>; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest je_amourx Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Lindoodoo; Though she is not completely "nude" she is topless and it's definitely a suggestive photo. Anyone else who takes the picture is fine but NOT MILEY. Why? She's a 15 year old pop sensation that little girls all over look up to. And by agreeing to do this photo shoot, does that mean other little girls who look up to her can be topless and have sheets covering them and provocative take pictures like that? Think about it. She really took a gamble doing this shoot. Everyone's at fault for this; the photographer who suggested this, her parents allowing it, and her - herself. People are not over-reacting, a 15year old Disney star should not be doing this. Once again, she's gambling with her career. As if her other self-taken pictures weren't scandalicious enough. I'm no fan or am bashing her, I'm just stating what she's doing is not necessarily the smartest thing to do ...... and how it will affect her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucasBunny Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Lindoodoo; Though she is not completely "nude" she is topless and it's definitely a suggestive photo. Anyone else who takes the picture is fine but NOT MILEY. Why? She's a 15 year old pop sensation that little girls all over look up to. And by agreeing to do this photo shoot, does that mean other little girls who look up to her can be topless and have sheets covering them and provocative take pictures like that? Think about it. She really look a gamble doing this shoot. Everyone's at fault for this; the photographer who suggested this, her parents allowing it, and her - herself. People are not over-reacting, a 15year old Disney star should not be doing this. Once again, she's gambling with her career. As if her other self-taken pictures weren't scandalicious enough. I'm no fan or am bashing her, I'm just stating what she's doing is not necessarily the smartest thing to do ...... and how it will affect her. ...please tell me what is provacative about the shot? provacative is what you see on the cover of FHM like Lindoodoo said you can still see the 15yr old innocence in her face like I said it's a bunch of girls in here bashing her TSK TSK shame on yall If they said it was a dress (which it looks like) would yall still bash her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest yg_bigbang Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Wow i love miley cyrus and all but this is way too much --x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wildflora Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 What's the big deal? I think she's looking really pretty in those shots. I mean, She's got nice skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elizabeth Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 I think it's practically normal. I mean come on I'm sure everyone probably seems worst 15 yr olds walking around school or your area/neighbors wearing more scandalous clothings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest schokolade Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 I like the topless one, it looks artistic and chic and the white skin actually suits her well. if you put the fact that she's HANNAH MONTANA aside, I like the pictures. and the topless one looks actually innocent and sophistacated. way better than lindsay lohan's weird topless pictures or vanessa hudgens. their topless pictures are just like ew and yuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sadana Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 not like she's showing her boobs or anything it's not sexual at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest xDD Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 the picture of her and her dad is the one that looks scary lol he's tan and she's just super white >< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antivogue Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 wtf. people are taking this too seriously. it's meant for artistic purposes. people are reading too much into it. and it's not even that bad. i thought it was SUPER DUPER ULTRA OBSCENE AND LASCIVIOUS AND SUGGESTIVE like lindsay lohan's pictures. but theyre not. to me theyre pretty tame. people should get the stick out that woo-haaa. god. making crap out of nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest latina Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 she looked pale in the first two pictures... seems like a vampire sucked all her blood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiki Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 ah... so these are the controversial pictures. ahha.. they're not that bad... I guess. she looks scary in the first caption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SUPERSTAR Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 dude it seems like she's been 15 forever. she was never a good girl, only pretended to be one because of HM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kissez* Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 WTF were they thinking?? She's a little girl! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linlinc Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Eeeek. How could Vanity Fair invite a 15 year old to pose topless? O_____________O That's too much. It's not all about Miley. It's about Vanity Fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ` ilytoo; Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 in those pictures, she looks like her dad is her lover or some thing like that. which is scary. shes like ghost pale dang. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Swtess Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 She does not look appealing in the picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiritm Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 technically she is not TOTALLY topless she is just exposing her back and it isn't suggestive at all and I get a more of innocent feel from it. It's suppost to be artistic which is exactly what it is. I think people are overreacting and in doing so just giving her more fame. I agree that she is too young to be doing photoshoots exposing skin like that (plus I'm the same age as her) but it isn't distasteful and my mom agrees (she is 50 btw) we both find it hilarious that you guys are giving her the time of day and you could just simply ignore it. Also SHE is the one who agreed to it and now she is saying that she didn't realize that it would create such a stir. Sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teatoast Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 she looks weird in the pics. it doesnt really suit her .___. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.