Behind The Scenes: Miley Topless In Vanity Fair

[Guest chungmah.]

She looks younger with all that makeup on o_o

and in the photo with her dad - she looks photoshopped in.

[Guest Lindoodoo]

Wow. Rofl. So much hate. .__.;

Her acting/looking older than she really is isn't agreeable, noting that she has many young fans, but this is actually meant to be an artistic shot. Really, it's actually beautiful. And in the photo, you can really see a 15-year-old innocence in her eyes. Some people in here just pay attention to the fact that she has no shirt on.

Plus, SHE'S NOT NAKED, GUYS. CALM YOURSELVES. -.-; She's covered up. Only her back and arms are exposed, like how it would look if she were to wear a bathing suit.

But don't get me wrong, I'm not defending her every move, it's just that this isn't something people should be overreacting about. And bashing her like this is just not right. >_>;

[Guest je_amourx]

Lindoodoo; Though she is not completely "nude" she is topless and it's definitely a suggestive photo. Anyone else who takes the picture is fine but NOT MILEY. Why?

She's a 15 year old pop sensation that little girls all over look up to. And by agreeing to do this photo shoot, does that mean other little girls who look up to her can be topless and have sheets covering them and provocative take pictures like that? Think about it. She really took a gamble doing this shoot. Everyone's at fault for this; the photographer who suggested this, her parents allowing it, and her - herself.

People are not over-reacting, a 15year old Disney star should not be doing this. Once again, she's gambling with her career. As if her other self-taken pictures weren't scandalicious enough. I'm no fan or am bashing her, I'm just stating what she's doing is not necessarily the smartest thing to do ...... and how it will affect her.

[LucasBunny]

Lindoodoo; Though she is not completely "nude" she is topless and it's definitely a suggestive photo. Anyone else who takes the picture is fine but NOT MILEY. Why?

She's a 15 year old pop sensation that little girls all over look up to. And by agreeing to do this photo shoot, does that mean other little girls who look up to her can be topless and have sheets covering them and provocative take pictures like that? Think about it. She really look a gamble doing this shoot. Everyone's at fault for this; the photographer who suggested this, her parents allowing it, and her - herself.

People are not over-reacting, a 15year old Disney star should not be doing this. Once again, she's gambling with her career. As if her other self-taken pictures weren't scandalicious enough. I'm no fan or am bashing her, I'm just stating what she's doing is not necessarily the smartest thing to do ...... and how it will affect her.

...please tell me what is provacative about the shot?

provacative is what you see on the cover of FHM

like Lindoodoo said

you can still see the 15yr old innocence in her face

like I said it's a bunch of girls in here bashing her

TSK TSK shame on yall

If they said it was a dress (which it looks like) would yall still bash her?

[Guest yg_bigbang]

Wow i love miley cyrus and all

but this is way too much

--x

[Guest Wildflora]

What's the big deal?

I think she's looking really pretty in those shots.

I mean, She's got nice skin.

[elizabeth]

I think it's practically normal. I mean come on I'm sure everyone probably seems worst 15 yr olds walking around school or your area/neighbors wearing more scandalous clothings.

[Guest schokolade]

I like the topless one, it looks artistic and chic

and the white skin actually suits her well.

if you put the fact that she's HANNAH MONTANA aside,

I like the pictures. and the topless one looks actually

innocent and sophistacated.

way better than lindsay lohan's weird topless pictures

or vanessa hudgens. their topless pictures are just like

ew and yuck.

[Guest Sadana]

not like she's showing her boobs or anything

it's not sexual at all

[Guest xDD]

the picture of her and her dad is the one that looks scary lol he's tan and she's just super white ><

[Guest antivogue]

wtf. people are taking this too seriously. it's meant for artistic purposes.

people are reading too much into it. and it's not even that bad. i thought it was SUPER DUPER ULTRA OBSCENE AND LASCIVIOUS AND SUGGESTIVE like lindsay lohan's pictures. but theyre not. to me theyre pretty tame.

people should get the stick out that woo-haaa. god. making crap out of nothing.

[Guest latina]

she looked pale in the first two pictures...

seems like a vampire sucked all her blood.

[kiki]

ah... so these are the controversial pictures.

ahha.. they're not that bad... I guess.

she looks scary in the first caption.

[Guest SUPERSTAR]

dude it seems like she's been 15 forever.

she was never a good girl, only pretended to be one because of HM.

[kissez*]

WTF were they thinking?? She's a little girl!

[linlinc]

Eeeek. How could Vanity Fair invite a 15 year old to pose topless? O_____________O That's too much.

It's not all about Miley. It's about Vanity Fair.

[Guest ` ilytoo;]

in those pictures, she looks like her dad is her lover or some thing like that.

which is scary. shes like ghost pale dang.

[Guest Swtess]

She does not look appealing in the picture

[Spiritm]

technically she is not TOTALLY topless she is just exposing her back and it isn't suggestive at all and I get a more of innocent feel from it. It's suppost to be artistic which is exactly what it is. I think people are overreacting and in doing so just giving her more fame. I agree that she is too young to be doing photoshoots exposing skin like that (plus I'm the same age as her) but it isn't distasteful and my mom agrees (she is 50 btw) we both find it hilarious that you guys are giving her the time of day and you could just simply ignore it. Also SHE is the one who agreed to it and now she is saying that she didn't realize that it would create such a stir. Sure.

[teatoast]

she looks weird in the pics. it doesnt really suit her .___.